Multilateralism and Minilateralism as Global Governance Mechanisms

نویسندگان

چکیده

Multilateralism and minilateralism are the main mechanisms of global governance. is characterized by membership inclusiveness, a low entry threshold for new members, focus on universality, while exclusivity, high no universality. Contemporary multilateral institutions emerged after World War II under influence American hegemony. The US commitment to multilateralism in governance has been inconsistent, setting stage current crisis aforementioned can be explained problems leadership, emergence polycentric power configuration world, as well specific actions both hegemon other great powers. issue was fueled increasingly evident ineffectiveness core dealing with pressing problems, deadlocks negotiations lack representation developing countries failure actors respond these challenges led proliferation minilateralist mechanism Two types distinguished – clubs most significant states (the first type) communities like-minded second type). advantage type ability solve minimal effort. Minilateralism positively its homogeneous structure cohesion ranks. advantages general include flexibility, adaptability, plasticity, quick decision-making, free, open effective resource saving. disadvantages legitimacy, limited technical financial capabilities, transparency accountability, vagueness goals focus. able somewhat increase effectiveness interaction within reducing number parties involved, but it unlikely overcome source governance, which mistrust between actors. disadvantage fragmentation international regimes. minilateral competitors motivate established reform demotivate participate will continue play large role mitigated combining multilateralist mechanism, using more rigorous approach selection participants, goal implementation agreements, introducing system indirect representation.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Multilateralism, the Eu and the Evolving Global Governance of the Internet

Whilst the global governance architecture for the Internet has evolved at pace in the last ten years the EU's role and influence in its formation and development has been relatively understudied. This paper contributes to closing this gap in the literature through an investigation of how the EU has sought to shape the emerging environment for Internet governance in the context of its quest for ...

متن کامل

Global health governance as shared health governance.

BACKGROUND With the exception of key 'proven successes' in global health, the current regime of global health governance can be understood as transnational and national actors pursuing their own interests under a rational actor model of international cooperation, which fails to provide sufficient justification for an obligation to assist in meeting the health needs of others. An ethical commitm...

متن کامل

Multilateralism and the Future of the Global Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime

Jayantha Dhanapala is the Under-Secretary General for Disarmament Affairs at the United Nations. He served as President of the 1995 Nonproliferation Treaty Review and Extension Conference. He has also served as the Ambassador of Sri Lanka to the United Nations in Geneva and the United States, worked as Director of the Geneva-based United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR), and ...

متن کامل

History, Structure and Agency in Global Health Governance; Comment on “Global Health Governance Challenges 2016 – Are We Ready?”

Ilona Kickbusch’s thought provoking editorial is criticized in this commentary, partly because she fails to refer to previous critical work on the global conditions and policies that sustain inequality, poverty, poor health and damage to the biosphere and, as a result, she misreads global power and elides consideration of the fundamental historical structures of political and material power tha...

متن کامل

Business as Usual: A Lack of Institutional Innovation in Global Health Governance; Comment on “Global Health Governance Challenges 2016 – Are We Ready?”

There were once again high expectations that a major global health event - the Ebola virus outbreak of 2014-2015 - would trigger meaningfully World Health Organization (WHO) reform and strengthen global health governance (GHG). Rather than a “turning point,” however, the global community has gone back to business as usual. This has occurred against a backdrop of worldwide political turmoil, cha...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: SŠA & Kanada: èkonomika, politika, kul?tura

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2686-6730']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/s2686673023030057